Article 35A Denied J&K Non-Residents Key Rights, Rules Supreme Court

0



 

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud declared today that Article 35A of the Constitution had deprived individuals not residing in Jammu and Kashmir of vital constitutional rights. He noted that this article stripped citizens of equality of opportunity, employment in the state government, and the right to purchase land. "All these rights were snatched away from citizens due to this article... The exclusion of non-residents was a result of the special rights enjoyed by the residents of Jammu and Kashmir," he stated. He also concurred with the assertion by the Central government that the Indian constitution holds a superior position compared to the J&K Constitution.

 

These remarks were made during the 11th day of hearings for petitions challenging the revocation of Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir.

 

Article 35A, revoked in August 2019 alongside Article 370, empowered the erstwhile state's legislature to define "permanent residents" and offer them specific rights and privileges concerning public employment, property, and settlement.

 

The Chief Justice emphasized, "Article 35A directly deprived citizens of the fundamental right under Article 16(1) to seek employment under the state government." He further noted that Article 35A infringed upon the right to live and settle in any part of the country, which is recognized by Article 19. This resulted in the curtailment of three fundamental rights, along with the power of judicial review.

 

The Centre has argued that scrapping the special status of Jammu and Kashmir has leveled the playing field. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, highlighted that this action aligned the region with the rest of the country and facilitated the implementation of previously unenforced welfare laws.

 

Mehta used the instance of the Right to Education, citing that this constitutional amendment had not been applied in Jammu and Kashmir until 2019 due to the specific procedural route required under Article 370. Justice Chandrachud reinforced this point, noting that amendments to the Indian Constitution didn't apply to Jammu and Kashmir until invoked through Article 370.

 


Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)